WORTH WATCHING 

drop.'s verdict
79 Very good
Drop Score 0–100 · synthesized from independent reviews — it measures quality, not price.
Saucony Peregrine 16 review: what runners say
- Fit
- True to size for most runners; slightly roomy toe box, solid heel and midfoot hold. Runners with wide feet or planning ultras should consider going up a half size. One reviewer notes the model 16 runs noticeably wide — up to a half size.
- Feel
- Medium-dynamic cushioning with 4 mm of additional PowerRun versus the previous model: more comfort without sacrificing responsiveness or ground connection. The ride remains energetic but not particularly lively according to some sources.
- Durability
- Upper is 400% more abrasion-resistant per Saucony. Vibram MegaGrip outsole with 4 mm lugs: expected longevity comparable to or better than previous models. The Peregrine 14 with PWRTRAC reached 600–700 km on the midsole; the Vibram on the 16 promises at least similar performance.
- Best for
- All-round trail shoe for daily use up to mid distance (50–60 km for runners around 70 kg). Excellent on mixed dry/wet terrain, rock, and hardpack; less effective in deep mud where taller lugs are needed. A good fit for runners looking for a single versatile trail model.
- Weak points
- Insufficient grip in thick, deep mud reported by multiple sources: the 4 mm lugs are not a substitute for a mud-specific model. Some runners miss the lively, responsive feel that defined the Peregrine 15, with the ride described as flat and unremarkable.
We read and watched 6 sources for you· 4 video · 2 articles
Prices compared across stores
5 shopsSpec sheet
- Drop
- 4 mm
- Heel stack
- 32 mm
- Forefoot stack
- 28 mm
- Weight
- 269 g
- Plate
- None
- Foam
- EVA
- Use
- Trail
Alternatives to Saucony Peregrine 16
same category · live priceWORTH WATCHING 

GREAT PRICE 

BEST DROP 
