WORTH WATCHING 

drop.'s verdict
81 Very good
Drop Score 0–100 · synthesized from independent reviews — it measures quality, not price.
The North Face Altamesa 300 V2 review: what runners say
- Fit
- Wide last with generous volume in the forefoot and midfoot. Narrow-footed runners report internal slippage and an oversized feel; for wide or high-volume feet it is a genuine advantage.
- Feel
- Single-layer EVA that is surprisingly soft and responsive, with a mild forefoot rocker. Some runners report a noticeable loss of foam character as early as 30–50 miles.
- Durability
- Surface CTRL SC2 rubber with 4 mm lugs in good condition past 50 miles of testing. Midsole longevity is uncertain: early degradation of cushioning properties noted by multiple reviewers, with doubts about reaching the standard 300-mile threshold.
- Best for
- Versatile daily trail shoe, from road-to-trail to moderately technical singletrack. Well suited to easy paces and long outings; not optimal in deep snow or thick mud.
- Weak points
- Fit too voluminous for narrow feet, with forefoot slippage. Midsole prone to faster-than-expected loss of responsiveness compared to other trail shoes in the category.
We read and watched 5 sources for you· 4 video · 1 article
Prices compared across stores
1 shopAlternatives to The North Face Altamesa 300 V2
same category · live priceWORTH WATCHING 

GREAT PRICE 

BEST DROP 
